The Oklahoma Dominionist Crisis

….to seek influence or control over secular civil government through political action…." The following is a statement which confirms the movement and its motivation in the American culture.

''Our job is to reclaim America for Christ, whatever the cost. As the 'Vice Regents of God,' we are to exercise Godly dominion and influence over our neighborhoods, our schools, our government, our literature and arts, our sports arenas, our entertainment media, our news media, our scientific endeavors — in short, over every aspect and institution of human society. ''http://www.theocracywatch.org/about_us2.htm

In describing Dominionist Theology Wikipedia states….

"All strains of Dominion Theology are small minorities, and are rejected by most mainstream Christians."

According to an accumulation of information collected by me from members of several political activist groups, Oklahoma's mainstream Legislators are selling out the state and federal Constitutions in favor of funding, and making laws which reflect Dominionist activities. So much so Dominionist Theology is no longer a minority, it has become the ruling force of the Oklahoma Legislature.

Several books are available about the methods of the Christian Dominionists to dominate politics like, ''Tempting Faith,'' by David Kuo. ''American Theocracy,'' by Kevin Phillips, and ''Faith and Politics,'' by Senator John Danforth. All outline the political goals of the religious right to influence aspects of American life. All confirm the corruption of the Faith Based Initiative programs….

In Arnold Hamilton's March 25th article, "Church-State, Separation In Peril, Wall's Tumbling Down?", the Editor of the Oklahoma Observer, points out prima facie, some of the felonies being committed. Hamilton makes no accusations but these felonies are in regard to criminal violations as to Oaths of Office, to protect both the Oklahoma State Constitution, and the U.S. Constitution. Hamilton's article points out specific Legislators and their actions, as did an entire conference I attended on March 29th of supporters of the Oklahoma Americans for the Separation of Church and State.

I've been collecting information on Dominionists for several years. I have on a regular basis shared this information with the Libertarian Party of Oklahoma, The Drug Policy Forum of Oklahoma, the National Judicial Conduct Disability Project, and several other political activists, and organizations. I currently serve as the Field Investigator, on the Board of Advisors for The Congress Against Racism, and Corruption in Law Enforcement.

One of the big parts of the Oklahoma crisis for me is that none of the organizations mentioned above can officially endorse any legal action against any of the Legislators they have documented proof against. This seems to me on one hand to be a little too 'Catch-22.'

One of the ways in Oklahoma for people to seek redress of grievances is to petition the Oklahoma Grand Jury. None of the Organizations I mentioned above, could officially endorse steps to present evidence and circulate the needed signatures of the electorate. One of the reasons for this is none of these organizations can stand up to any liability in case they are sued. Their primary mission as they see it is to raise public awareness.

This means the only viable solution to put together a petition for the Oklahoma Grand Jury is to do it with a force of individuals who need to meet the criteria of proofs, and collect the signatures for the required petition. Then it has to be submitted and reviewed by a District Court. It has to be done so no organization gets involved. Very tricky, but other Oklahomans have done it. According to one of my attorney friends people in Florida (clients/associates) have been murdered going up against the Dominionist forces. I know other judicial reformers who have been abused.

If the Dominionists see a Grand Jury action coming there is a chance they could stop it, due to the last provision of the Oklahoma Grand Jury section of the state Constitution which allows citizens to petition. The last sentence of the Section II-18 provision of the Oklahoma State Constitution says…. "The Legislature shall enact laws to prevent corruption for convening a grand jury." There is little question the Dominionists would interpret such an action against them as an unlawful insurrection of sorts. There are ample horror stories of violence, and outrageous abuses against people who have stood up to the Dominionists.

I have spoken with Mikey Weinstein the Founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, and I know he, his supporters, and family have been shot at, threatened, and abused by minions of the Dominionist movement. There is no doubt that Dominionists see Mikey and his organization a serious threat. Mikey has documented the infiltration of the Dominionists into the United States Military, and they have created the same kind of crisis there as in the Oklahoma Legislature. Mikey's experiences as an activist are proof the Dominionists will use any means.

Those that take an 'Oath' to defend the Constitution need to know, this is a serious commitment, and subversion of it, is a serious crime. Few politicians in the state of Oklahoma have much regard for this obligation. The Dominionists have taken over the Legislature and their abuses have become a matter of public record. The 'Americans United' presentations at the March Conference, disclosed a number of serious violations of the state and federal 'Separation' clause, and the state mandate…

Section II-5, of the Oklahoma State Constitution…

"No public money or property shall ever by appropriated, or used directly or indirectly for the use, benefit, or support of any sect, church, denomination, or system of religion, or for the use, benefit, or support of any priest, preacher, minister, or other religious teacher or dignitary, or sectarian institution as such. "

This provision of the Oklahoma State Constitution makes it clear that no money 'directly or indirectly' should go to any religious organization. There can be little doubt this provision is related directly to the Separation clause of the First Amendment. This is only one of many concerns which involve the criminal negligence to protect constitutional mandates.

It has become a matter of public record that Oklahoma State Rep. Rebecca Hamilton diverted funds to her own church. The anti Gay outlawing and rantings of Rep. Sally Kern, have become as much a national embarrassment as did the rantings of Florida's Rep. Katharine Harris. The Dominionist movement has permeated the entire Oklahoma government, at all levels. Dominionist legislation that has to be challenged in courts is costing taxpayers millions of dollars.

One of the claims of the Oklahoma Dominionists is that they are distributing federal money, and it does not apply to their state obligations. I ask, "If I claim to 'indirectly slap' you upside your head does that make me 'not guilty' of battery, or manslaughter?" I don't think ''Barbara Jean" on "Reba" is stupid enough to believe that theory. But she was not an Oakie.

The question is how would an Oklahoma Grand Jury look at this problem? Perhaps an entire Grand Jury of Dominionists has to be a consideration in Oklahoma. Anyone who might use this, or other methods for the redress of grievances, or the fair reporting of crimes must go against an entrenched enemy of Constitutional law. The Dominionists seem to run Oklahoma. Taking them on is a nightmare no matter how you look at it.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply