The Anti-Rally Rally

… “Restore Honor,” a most worthy goal… one that modern day America needs to pursue with renewed passion.

People from all over the country bought plane, train, and bus tickets, or carpooled with others to attend the rally. So many traveled to Washington for the rally that hotel rooms were impossible to get. Some rally-goers were required to book hotels and motels forty or fifty miles away.

The rally was a huge success, drawing some 500,000 to 650,000 people from every state in the nation. They were orderly and well-behaved, and when the professional black rabble-rouser, Rev. Al Sharpton, announced that he would hold a counter rally in southeast Washington, just a few miles away, some feared that the two groups might clash and that the competing rallies would devolve into 60s style violence.

There is little doubt that that was precisely what Sharpton had in mind. If there was to be yet another opportunity to convince black Americans that the American Dream was not there for them unless they maintained their solidarity with the Democrat Party, in spite of decades of professional black agitation and welfare pimping by himself and Jesse Jackson, he wanted to be sure that he was there to lead the attack, violent or non-violent, for the network TV cameras.

Clearly, Beck and his organizers understood that the potential for violence lay just beneath the surface. In response, and to prevent his peaceful rally from becoming just another excuse for the mainstream media to bash the Tea Party movement, Beck requested that those attending his rally not come armed with anti-big government, anti-tax, anti-spending, and anti-Obama picket signs. And in spite of the fact that those attending his rally had transported tons of poster board and other sign-making materials for just that purpose, they all honored his request. Hardly a picket sign was to be seen in the immense crowd.

It must have been a big disappointment for Sharpton, who had already scheduled appearances on every network to deliver his post-mortem on the Beck rally. As it turned out, he was at a loss for words. His only point of quickly-manufactured controversy was the charge that Beck and his mostly white crowd had attempted to hijack Martin Luther King’s legacy. Most viewers responded with a yawn or a puzzled, “Huh?”

But now we learn that the rally concept is about to grow a painful wart. Seeing a grassroots patriotic movement take shape right before their eyes, where millions of hard-working, tax-paying Americans have become sufficiently aroused to take to the streets… a phenomenon that has heretofore been largely the province of the violence-prone elements of organized labor and the radical left… some leftists see the need to mock the process in such a way as to discredit the Beck rally and the Tea Party movement. Late night comedians Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert have announced plans to hold a rally in Washington, DC, a la the Beck rally.

The question is, will it work or will the idea fall flat on its face? I say it will fall flat on its face… for a number of very good reasons.

First, who is to lead the effort? Who are Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert? These are men of marginal comedic ability who are cheap imitations of David Letterman, who is a cheap imitation of Jay Leno, who is the widely-accepted heir to the throne of Johnny Carson. They are the pied-pipers of a segment of our population who are simply too intellectually lazy to form real political opinions of their own and who find it convenient to mask their ignorance of history and current affairs with a bit of humor.

After graduating from our public schools, where they learn so little about American history and government that few could compete with naturalized citizens, they are suddenly thrust into an adult world where they find themselves with both free speech and voting rights… real grown-up responsibilities.

They haven’t the foggiest notion of what to do with those newfound responsibilities so they tune in to either Stewart or Colbert where they are sure to find safety in numbers. As members of that audience they will never be required to embarrass themselves by publicly displaying their ignorance. That is what Stewart and Colbert are all about, and nothing more. They provide comedic cover for the politically ignorant and the intellectually lazy.

In August 1969, thousands of mostly young people gathered on a large farm near Bethel, New York for an outdoor rock concert. It was what came to be known as Woodstock… a three-day orgy of incredibly bad music, drunkenness, sex, and drugs. It was an opportunity for teens and twenty-somethings to get drunk, stoned, and laid, all in broad daylight and with all of the world looking on. In many respects, the level of irresponsibility that Woodstock meant to the music world, is little different from what Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert mean to the serious business of politics and government.

The one great difference is that Woodstock represented a memorable moment in the American culture. It will be long remembered as a generational sea change; the Stewart-Colbert rally will not. It will be quickly forgotten because it will have no real purpose, much like the lives of most who will attend. It is not political advancement or enlightenment, it is pure political escapism.

Will Stewart and Colbert attract large crowds to their rally… comparable to the Beck rally? Not likely. Unlike the Stewart and Colbert audiences, those who attended the Beck rally were people who had attended primary and secondary schools when it really meant something; they were people who behaved themselves in school and who did their homework; they were people who had jobs, who showed up for work every day, on time, and who gave their employers their very best effort.

It is people like these who would drive for days to attend a day-long rally with the theme, “Restore Honor.” It does not describe the Stewart and Colbert audiences.

Can we expect those who are too intellectually lazy to form their own political opinions to travel all the way to Washington for nothing more than a pointless counter-rally designed to mock the Beck rally? Not likely. If Stewart and Colbert are able to draw a tenth, or even a hundredth of the crowd that attended the Beck rally, they will be locals… mostly government employees who will take off work, on the taxpayer’s dime, to attend.

It will be yet another metaphor for left wing politics in America.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Authors Note: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >>

Stephen Colbert's appearance before a House Judiciary subcommittee yesterday was a travesty. Perhaps my sense of humor has eroded a bit since Obama seized office, but I saw nothing humorous about it. Many commentators, mostly on Fox News, have referred to Colbert as a "clown" and to the Democrats who scheduled him and listened to him as "clowns." This gives real clowns a bad name and they should apologize. Ronald McDonald is probably ashamed to show his face today.

And to think that the day has arrived when I find myself agreeing with John Conyers (D-MI), who asked Colbert to remove himself from the hearing room!!! The world is truly upside-down.

Paul

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply