Social Justice – By Whose Definition?

Social Justice – well, by whose Definition? Either the overtly Marxist world citizen, B. Hussein Obama, or the USA Constitution? I guess it depends on whose ox is being gored or in this case who is screwing the American taxpayer citizens.

I have been confused for some time about the conflict between "Social Justice" as used by the USA Marxists who demand social equality and at the same time propose destruction of the United States, its people, constitution and rule of law.

Clearly, their [the USA marxists/liberals or any word meaning the same thing] method is to: they readily defame, and destroy anyone who disagrees with their objectives to achieve their communist designed "social justice.

According to Karl Marx: “The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.”

"Israel Cohen supports the communist agenda of: "We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tension. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by the whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to install in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes.

We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause." ~ Israel Cohen, a leading Communist in England, in his 'A Racial Program For The 20th Century (1912).' Quoted by Congressman Abernathy, Congressional Record, June 7, 1957, p. 8559

James Baldwin "The civilized have created the wretched, quite coldly and deliberately, and do not intend to change the status quo; are responsible for their slaughter and enslavement; rain down bombs on defenseless children whenever and wherever they decide that their "vital interests" are menaced, and think nothing of torturing a man to death:

these people are not to be taken seriously when they speak of the "sanctity" of human life, or the "conscience" of the civilized world." – page 489 of COLLECTED ESSAYS (1998), from chapter one of "The Devil Finds Work" (orig. pub. 1976)

That contradiction in positions on the one hand where they say they want human rights for all and on the other hand they work to destroy individual freedoms can not be explained except in the concept of social order as defined in the writings of Marx.

It is the basic belief that social order ultimately comes from revolution arising from conflict between ruling and working classes that will result in the Utopian society of "social justice" after the fictional evil of capitalism and individual rights is ended.

This Marxist government model fails to recognize failures of every communist government system developed. They attempt to define all different peoples of unique cultures, races, heritages, religions, and histories as one group of an oppressed class. They do not appear to understand group dynamics arising from tribal like conflicts between people of similar economic status. Class warfare does not explain territoriality of humans and other animal species recognized by behavioral scientists.

There are multiple different groupings based on similar characteristics and similar social orders instead of economic positions that are not appreciated by our Marxist USA. I and many other patriots demand compliance with the USA Constitution and our rule of law that guides our social and legal relationships as citizens of a sovereign nation.

Those beliefs have been abandoned by a new group of greedy corrupt politicians that no longer agree with the premise a group of free people can band together and create a sovereign nation state under the rule of those free people in the state.

It seems one of the guiding principles of Marxist "social justice" includes an idea that all mankind is a member of the same political organization and share equally in benefits of each and all of individual nation states as they choose.

The new social justice concept is not new, it is a part of old failed Marxist ideology that insists there is a common political bond between all workers of the world. All oppressed people of the world are of one political entity that being the world communist state.

That objective was falsely realized in the minds of many Marxists when the current United Nations was developed. Richard M Nixon State Department Most members are one-world-government ideologists whose long- term goals were officially summed up in September 1961 State Department Document 7277, adopted by the Nixon Administration: "…elimination of all armed forces and armaments except those needed to maintain internal order within states and to furnish the United Nations with peace forces…by the time it (UN global government) would be so strong no nation could challenge it."

According to Richard N. Gardner:

LIMITED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT “Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men.” The world communist state does not recognize rights of individuals to own property or individual rights as ever being paramount over the rights of the communist state. Marxist Social justice defines all property as owned by the state and not individuals.

This precept of “social justice” is key to understanding the USA Marxist movement to eliminate USA borders and provide equal access to "Constitutional rights of USA citizens" to people who violate our sovereignty and illegally enter the country.

In the Marxist world we are all members of the "human race" and no nation state can deprive any world citizen of their rights to invade your nation state.

There are no individual property rights, so what is yours is theirs.

The Marxist mind for instance sees dilution of our Social Security contract by providing free care to illegal aliens as totally proper since no individual USA citizen has a “social justice” right to deprive any of the people of the world of their "human rights."

In the Marxist USA there are no illegal aliens. All people of the world are one, a single communist entity where everyone has the social right to go and live where they chose unless decided otherwise by the state.

They can do what is necessary for the benefit of the state only.

It is now therefore easy to understand the term “social justice” used bythe Marxists in the USA, it does not apply to the 'decadent' USA middle class citizens.

The marxists/liberals/progressives/left believe that what is yours/ours is no longer ours but it all belongs to the oppressed of the world. We Americans must all therefore be punished for our overindulgence, materialism and idleness.

Marxists also insist that humans can not survive as individuals but only as members of a larger social group, the communist state. We are no more than ants/insects working for the queen in a colony of worker ants that can not survive outside the socialized colony.

According to Marx again: “Society does not consist of individuals, but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand.”, ~ The Grundrisse (1857) .

These Marxist concepts have stealthily been developed and implanted in our nation, the USA, by a massive propaganda machine sponsored by global corporate powers in conjunction with all of the co-conspirator USA public officials.

Widespread integration of Marxist political ideology has overtaken our school curriculums, local and state governments and most of all our federal government.

Presidents and the congress have taken the power from the constitution which they consider those constitutional principles to be worthless and so to be ignored.

They routinely violate ideals of a free republic citizen state and replace it with the seeming directives of the 'new world order' plan of open borders, worldwide taxes, and thru the United Nations being in control, all the way down to local government with the stated “ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability programs.”

The single objective they pursue is not "social justice" but world enslavement of the working class under control of a one world Marxist government.

They are destroying the basic order of all nations states which are based on the rule of law and the protection of the G-D given individual rights and especially eliminating the individuals property ownership rights.

"Social Justice" is Marxist code for the planned destruction of the rule of law for individual rights, the end of private property ownership, the end of any sovereign states/country/constitution, and the creation of a one world Marxist government.

Karl Marx according to: “The theory of Communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property."

Karl Marx again: “The representation of private interests … abolishes all natural and spiritual distinctions by enthroning in their stead the immoral, irrational and soulless abstraction of a particular material object and a particular consciousness which is slavishly subordinated to this object.”

Marx:, On the Thefts of Wood, in Rheinische Zeitung (1842) Marxist forms of government are widely recognized as utter failures that lead to ruin for all working people. They only serve to concentrate power and wealth in the hands of a few that house of world order will have to be built from the bottom up rather than the top down. It will look like a great booming, buzzing confusion. . an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault”

CFR member, in 1974 Foreign Affairs article: "The Hard Road to World Order" Given that one world order political state; the legal justice systems of independent nation states no longer have a primary control over the rule of law for sovereign nations.

Marxist Social justice demands all people of the world be treated with basic "human rights" in this communist one world Utopian society. By definition the world Utopian state can not exist as long as sovereign nation states exist. They must be replaced by a global world government under the communist banner for all people to receive "social justice" and equity.

Karl Marx: “In a higher phase of communist society… only then can the narrow horizon of bourgeois right be fully left behind and society inscribe on its banners: from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”

Criminal justice systems rely on concepts of some form of equity in justice for crimes against property and people. Those criminal acts are treated as crimes against the government "we the people" itself. The rule of law defines societal approved behavior and corresponding punishments for violating those approved behaviors. The law is the commanding force and no individual is above the law. The rules in theory apply equally to all.

Marxist USA instead recognizes only rights of the state as being the supreme right of society and rights of the individual are subordinated to those of the state.

Our USA constitution clearly defines individual rights of citizens the most important of which include rights to pursue life liberty and happiness.

A great emphasis is placed on right of individuals to own property in that quest for life liberty and happiness.

Thomas Jefferson: the rule of law is a LIMITED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT "The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite."

Thomas Jefferson: the rule of law – on liberty also imposes a LIMITED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT – “Rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add 'within the limits of the law' because law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the rights of the individual.”

John Locke (1632-1704) rule of law “Every man has a property in his own person. This nobody has a right to, but himself.” John Locke (1632-1704) rule of law “Man… hath by nature a power …. to preserve his property – that is, his life, liberty, and estate – against the injuries and attempts of other men.”

John Adams rule of law property rights "The moment the idea is admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws of God, and that there is not a force of law and public justice to protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence. Property must be sacred or liberty cannot exist.

If `Thou shalt not covet' and `Thou shalt not steal' were not commandments of Heaven, they must be made inviolable precepts in every society before it can be civilized or made free." (A Defense of the American Constitutions, 1787) Reference: The Works of John Adams, C.F. Adams, ed., vol. 6 (8-9); The Founders Constitution John Adams rule of lawnslave and murder the working classes to assure control. Jonathan Swift Irish author, 1667-1745-“For in reason, all government without the consent of the governed is slavery.”

This process for the first time is now jointly pursued by international monopolistic corporate owners of capital in conjunction with their Marxist political pawns.

The truly wealthy who control our national interests don't care what kind of government controls us as long as they control the government and the money. James P. Warburg banking corruption "We shall have world government, whether or not we like it," …"The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest." international banker in testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1950.

The Price of Losing by William P. Hoar

James Madison banking money creation corruption "History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance." (Reason Constitution requires congress to create money.)

James A. Garfield banking tyranny: "Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce."

Rockefeller (David) banking: "For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions.

Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interest of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists ' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."

David Rockefeller, Memoirs, 2002 – Rockefeller (David) government communism "The enormous social advances of China have benefited greatly from the singleness of ideology and purpose . . . The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao's leadership is one of the most important and successful in history." 1973 View on Communist China Rockefeller (David) "We are on the verge of a global transformation.

All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." Rockefeller (David) before a Congressional committee “You know, gentlemen, that I do not owe any personal income tax. But nevertheless, I send a small check, now and then, to the Internal Revenue Service out of the kindness of my heart.”- Rockefeller (John D. Rockefeller) “Competition is a sin.”

Rockefeller (John D Rockefeller I) banking tyranny “The combination is here to stay. Individualism has gone, never to return.”

Rockefeller (NY Gov. Nelson) "as President, he would work toward international creation of a new world order." AP Report July 26, 1968 Rockefeller (Nelson Rockefeller) “The secret to success is to own nothing, but control everything.”

Rothschild (Baron Nathan Mayer de Rothschild) banking tyranny “The best time to buy is when blood is running in the streets.”

Rothschild (Mayer Amschel Rothschild) banking tyranny “Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws”

Rothschild (Baron Nathan Mayer de Rothschild) (1777-1836) banking tyranny “I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the Empire … The man that controls Britain's money supply controls the British Empire. And I control the money supply.”

There is no political party in the USA now other than the Marxist USA party. The Marxist media, has provided the Marxist USA party with propaganda news and cover ups of criminal actions to assure their success in destroying our nation state.

Global United Nations taxes are going to be levied against us to pay for the sins of our greedy capitalist USA society that have damaged the world economy and environment.

Marxist fools fail to recognize success of a Republic Government system that provides incentives for individuals to work for their success and take responsibility for their actions.

Instead of destroying the first government Constitutional Republic in the world able to create such a wealthy middle class, they should instead be trying to emulate it in the other nations who have not achieved the same levels of success. God help us all if the Marxist USA succeeds in final destruction of rule of law, individual freedoms and a sovereign republic, in the name of "Social Justice."

Social Justice is the same as government by the communist state.

Fight Marxist America haters now while we still have a chance to win without bloodshed. Conservative dissertations will provide some reference source for those interested.

These "conservative" people still don't understand the Marxist support for economic globalization or the threat it represents to nation state sovereignty. They remain free traders even the Marxist support it knowing it will destroy nation states and help the global revolution. They do recognize assaults on individual freedom and rights however.

Engels: “Under the freedom of trade the whole severity of the laws of political economy will be applied to the working classes.

Is that to say that we are against Free Trade? No, we are for Free Trade, because by Free Trade all economical laws, with their most astounding contradictions, will act upon a larger scale, upon a greater extent of territory, upon the territory of the whole earth; and because from the uniting of all these contradictions into a single group, where they stand face to face, will result the struggle which will itself eventuate in the emancipation of the proletarians.”

Engels, To Free Trade Congress at Brussels (1847) Marx & Engels “What is free trade, what is free trade under the present condition of society? It is freedom of capital. When you have overthrown the few national barriers which still restrict the progress of capital, you will merely have given it complete freedom of action. … But, in general, the protective system of our day is conservative, while the free trade system is destructive. It breaks up old nationalities and pushes the antagonism of the proletariat and the bourgeoisie to the extreme point. In a word, the free trade system hastens the social revolution. It is in this revolutionary sense alone, gentlemen, that I vote in favor of free trade.” Marx & Engels, On Free Trade (1848) Karl Marx writings clearly define the concept of social justice.

There is a plethora of literature and interpretations from legal scholars through the last few centuries. It is easy enough for anyone to find the Marxist perspective of "social justice" by listening to the Marxist Party USA.

Democrats and Republicans both have supported redistribution of USA middle income class wealth to both monopolistic global super rich and the poor of the world.

The problem with both the Marxist and conservative or libertarian positions is neither provide for flexibility to do what makes sense in a broader view.

In each the left and right wing proposals for government they refuse to see the benefit to society of individual freedom couple with necessary involvement of government when individual rights are trampled. Right wingers are content to let international global monopolies destroy the entrepreneurial small businesses in the USA, and the Left wing.

Marxists are content to take all the hard earned assets of the workers be taken from them to give to the rest of the world.

No system of government or economic enterprise can work without a balance between competing forces. If one has control over the other both lose. If wages are artificially depressed with mass illegal immigration, all workers suffer, and ultimately the owners of capital suffer as their business fails. If entrepreneurs are taxed to heavily they will close their business and the workers and employers lose again.

Max Eastman: “The real guarantee of freedom is equilibrium of social forces in conflict, not the triumph of any one force.”

"We the People" are kicked to the side by both systems.

We must have a constitutional sensibility that recognizes need to have government intervene when necessary only to assure no monopolies or other special interests destroy the free enterprise system with trade agreements, or with special government handouts and regulatory protections including tax breaks for leaving the country or other adverse artificial influences that destroy the necessary balance between employers, workers, consumers and produces of goods and services.

Our federal government has the duty to protect individual rights when one of us starts to infringe on the rights of another citizen.

When the government starts doing that we can expect the Marxist USA to return to the Constitutional USA Republic Democracy.

Thomas Jefferson rule of law duty of government: "The freedom and happiness of man…[are] the sole objects of all legitimate government." (letter to Thaddeus Kosciusko, 1810) Reference: Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Lipscomb and Bergh, eds., 12:369.

Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) rule of law LIMITED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT:

"No man has a natural right to commit aggression on the equal rights of another, and this is all from which the laws ought to restrain him." — US Founding Father, drafted the Declaration of Independence, 3rd US President was the principal author of the Declaration.

James Madison rule of law property rights: "Government is instituted to protect property of every sort; as well that which lies in the various rights of individuals, as that which the term particularly expresses. This being the end of government, that alone is a just government which impartially secures to every man whatever is his own." (Essay on Property, 29 March 1792) Reference: Madison: Writings, Rakove, ed., Library of America (515)

"Social Justice" by any definition can never exist as long as the government infringes on the unalienable rights of individuals. It will never exist in a one world order communist government. Individual freedom and "social justice" by any definition can not succeed in one world communist or democratic state. The conqueror resides within our borders and fully intends to destroy us.

Niccolo Machiavelli war conquered states. The Prince (illegal alien invasion) "Conquered states that have been accustomed to liberty and the government of their own laws can be held by the conqueror in three different ways.

The first is to ruin them;

the second, for the conqueror to go and reside there in person;

and the third is to allow them to continue to live under their own laws, subject to a regular tribute, and to create in them a government of a few, who will keep the country friendly to the conqueror":

Niccolo Machiavelli, The Prince Ghandi (self government) “Men … should do their actual living and working in communities … small enough to permit of genuine self-government and the assumption of personal responsibilities, federated into larger units in such a way that the temptation to abuse great power should not arise. The larger (structurally) a democracy grows, the less becomes the rule of the people and the smaller is the say of individuals and localised groups in dealing with their own destinies. Moreover, love and affection, are essentially personal relationships. Consequently, it is only in small groups that Charity, in the Pauline sense of the word, can manifest itself. Needless to say, the smallness of the group, in no way guarantees the emergence of Charity. In a large undifferentiated group, the possibility does not even exist, for the simple reason that most of its members cannot, in the nature of things, have personal relations with one another.”

Mahatma Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948) John Collier in 'From every Zenith ' "

“Social Justice” Defined by George Hawley 02 December 2004 “As a general rule, the less logic there is behind an argument, the more often the words “social justice” are uttered in defending it. The disciples of the Left have abandoned some of their more enthusiastic calls to action in recent years (“workers of the world unite” just isn’t turning out the big crowds anymore). But whenever they need an excuse to assault American society, both then and now, there is still a handy phrase that always helps advance their goals: “social justice.”

After examining what the “social justice” warriors call for, one can only assume that their catch-all expression means the following: America’s hopelessly antiquated founding principles of individual freedom, personal responsibility, private property, and the self-directed pursuit of happiness all need to be undermined and replaced with collectivism, socialism and cultural relativism (i.e., Western Civilization is evil and to be blamed for all the world’s problems).

“Social justice” has proven indispensable to its proponents because of its ambiguity. If it could generally be understood to mean something like, the “equal protection of the laws,” it would perhaps be tolerable, but the left rarely uses it in that context. They use it because it is much easier to run on a platform of “social justice,” than on the more accurate description: social-ism.” Second conservative viewpoint: Social Justice by Walter Block

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply