N. Y. Legal Cases Are “Fixed” Behind Closed Doors & Behind Litigants’ Backs

…Then they elect a third lawyer to be a judge to throw more billing opportunities to them. Then they elect themselves into the legislation to concoct more laws for more controversy and more billing. Villagers are are now "protected" by the legal mafia, the "law is upheld:" they are stripped of their life-savings, inheritance and future earnings, while the legal eagles line up their pockets with gold.

That's the socioeconomic model of the slow demise of this country.

The following press release shows an egregious example of behind-the-closed-doors, off-the-record dealings between the judge and her former cohort.

Legal cases are “fixed” at ex parte “conferences” between Jacqueline Sands (the self-appointed “law guardian”) and her former boss, Judge Linda Christopher, behind the back of the litigant, in blatant violation of the Due Process of law, NY Judiciary Law, Canons of Judicial Conduct and rules of the court.

Ms. Jacqueline Sands is an “attorney for children” who acquired notoriety in the New York legal community as a “child murderess,” and a lawyer who is “never confused by the facts.” (She had recommended child custody to a mentally ill mother, also a lawyer, who subsequently killed her child.) Ms. Sands employs illegal ex parte meetings with the judge and “testifies” in court, fabricating “evidence,” as shown here and further, in separate upcoming press releases.

Thus, on August 24, 2009, Jacqueline Sands held an ex parte conference in the courthouse with Judge Linda Christopher, her former boss at the Legal Aid Society, in absence of the parties, at which the two "officers of the court" made decisions in advance of the upcoming trial in order to pre-fix its outcome, as disclosed (perhaps accidentally) in the fax letter from J. Sands to Judge Linda Christopher. By so doing they violated NYS Judiciary Law, Rules of the Chief Administrator, Rules and Codes governing the conduct of Attorneys for Children and Judges. In further violation of the law, they concealed said “conference” despite their duty to disclose to the respondent against whom they had conspired at said ex parte “conference.” Further, the trial court attempted to “lose” said letter from the court file and even deny its existence; it denied the respondent access to the file, in violation of Due Process; Respondent gained access to his own file only after its transference to the Appellate Division.

In her fax letter of September 4, 2009 to Judge Linda Christopher, Ms. Sands refers to the “conference held on August 24, 2009” – apparently to jog judge’s memory of the decision made at this clandestine “conference.” The “conference” was held in absence of the party and his attorney, just between the Judge and her former cohort Jacqueline Sands, a party to the proceeding scheduled for 9/8/09. The hand-written markings at the top of the fax letter clearly indicate it as material to the trial to be held two weeks later, on 9/8/09. Despite the deliberately deceptive lettering “cc:”, no copy was provided to the respondent; the mere fact of the occurrence of the ex-parte conference, as well as the substance of what Ms. Sands discussed with Judge Christopher was conceal from the record of the trial and the respondent.

Only because we had obtained a digital photo of said letter through inside sources, did the court's personnel "found" the “incredible disappearing letter, ” which proves the occurrence of the ex parteconference on August 24, 2009; it can be scrutinized at this URL: www.RocklandFamilyCourt/release-1/LG-Letter-Re-Ex-Parte-Conference.pdf . This and other far-reaching ex parte decisions and orders are documented in www.RocklandFamilyCourt/release-1/Appellate-Brief-Names-Sanitized.pdf (search for “ex parte”, or see page 15.)

Contact: Eric Ross, Ph.D., Investigative Reporter, National Writers Syndicate; e-Mail:

Info@RocklandFamilyCourt.org ~ telephone: (845) 268-5565

For more information see www.RocklandFamilyCourt.org/press.html

To all US national and global media, including newspapers, radio and TV stations; British, Canadian and Australian media; French, German, Austrian, Irish, and Russian media outlets; to trade unions, professional organizations, trade and professional publications, political action committees, US and NY legislators, Rockland County legislators.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply