Federal Judges/Justices Discriminate Against Pro Se Plaintiff

When it comes to how Pro Se (self represented) litigants, the Federal Courts run a bait and switch, scam, fraud, discriminatory, and a multitude of other types of violation type of operation.

In the last nearly 4 years, I, as a Pro Se Plaintiff/Appellant/Petitioner, have been discriminated by the U. S. District Court – District of Southern Nevada (twice), 9th Circuit Court of Appeals (twice), and the U. S. Supreme Court (once). Through research, I found that this is a common violation and victimization against Pro Se litigants at the hands of corrupt, unethical, Federal Judge. Yet these bias and discriminating Judge are allowed to do this because they can cowardly hide under the Judicial Immunity blanket.

Article III Section 1. The judicial power of the

United States

, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. When Judges/Justices clearly violate the above and discriminate against an invidious class (Pro Se Litigants) is that considered good behavior. Certainly these failures of good behavior call for Impeachment of Judges in my cases, including the Chief Judges who knew about said violations and failed to act to rectify these matters.

Dr. Charles W. Heckman clearly state in his Court Task Force Report. Full report can be found at http://victimsoflaw.net/9thcircuit1.htm. There are other Task Force Reports, as well.

“Prejudices often have a greater impact on the outcome of administrative hearings and lawsuits than parties with an obligation to be impartial like to admit. Whether the prejudice is deliberate and malicious or entirely unintended, decisions colored by personal biases can be just as devastating to the victims of the resulting injustice.”

“The most common complaints by litigants of misconduct by the courts include the following: 1. Perjury is tolerated by the judge, 2. Records submitted to the court disappear from the files., 3. Judges’ opinions fail to address the issues of the lawsuit, 4. Certain litigants must always win, 5. Different standards are applied to different litigants, 6. Recent handling of civil lawsuits by the courts have instigated a white collar crime wave, 7. Court orders go unheeded, 8. Judges give orders contrary to law and accepted standards of behavior, 9. Judges refuse to take actions required by law, 10. Courts have become inconsistent and arbitrary, 11. Federalism theory interferes with practical justice.

In both my cases: perjury committed by opposing attorneys were tolerated and permitted by the Judges, Judges’ opinions fail to address the issues of the lawsuit, Judges give orders contrary to law and accepted standards of behavior, and Judges refuse to take actions required by law. Said Judges and Justices also violated Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) 8(d), 12(a)(1)(A), 55(a), 56(a), Local Rules 56-1 and 77-1(b)(2), 15 U.S.C. § 618, § 623, § 1681n, § 1681s, and § 1681s-2. All 3 of said courts have clearly shown violations of the 14th Amendments Equal Protection Clause, Canon 3(B)(5), 3(B)(6), 3(B)(8), as well as Civil Rights and the Preamble to the Constitution.

When I contacted all of the U. S. Senate and House of Representatives Judiciary Committee, to get legislation to eliminate Judicial Immunity, I was told by a few of their representatives, that I alone would not be able to get a meeting, however if I managed to get a celebrity to speak in front of them, then they would meet with me and the celebrity. I, actually, did contact numerous celebrities, yet to date none have responded. Why aren’t the words of a poor victim good enough for these committees?

When I contacted and went to the

Las Vegas

offices of the F.B.I. and U.S. Department of Justice, regarding said matter and ready to show them the nearly 700 pages of documents and proof, they blew me off.

The 2 civil lawsuits that I filed, one is against University Medical Center of Southern Nevada (UMC) (U. S. Supreme Court Docket No. 06-10179, 9th Circuit Court Docket No. 04-16825). The other is against Allstate Financial Services dba Allstate Adjustment Bureau (ALLSTATE) (9th Circuit Court Docket No. 06-16259). The ALLSTATE case is still awaiting the appointment of a 3 Judge Panel. It's been over a year. Both cases deal with Fair Credit Reporting Act Violations, Extortion, Fraud, Slander/Libel/Defamation of Character, etc.

In the UMC case the U.S. District Court – District of Southern Nevada was Phillip Pro. The 9th Circuit Court3 Judge panel consisted of Judges Leavy, Skopil, and Boochever. In the ALLSTATE case the U.S. District Court – District of Southern Nevada was Kent Dawson. No 3 Judge Panel has been assigned to this case yet.

I have tried many sources to find an attorney to represent me in either and both cases, however since I cannot afford an attorney, I had and am forced to represent myself. I contact the few pro bono, legal aid attorneys, yet either they are out of business, or they do not handle this type of case, or they no longer do pro bono or contingency cases.

Please, on behalf of many Pro Se litigants, help me eliminate Judicial Immunity, so that the scales of justice will again be balanced and that justice will be for all.

If these discriminatory practices are allowed to continue many more people will suffer from Legal Abuse Syndrome.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply