9/11 Why Is No One Blaming Bill Clinton and the Democrats?

….urgent threats to

America

after the first bombing of the

World

Trade

Center

on

Feb. 26, 1993

. That is where today's election clamor and investigation should be focused.

Clinton's understating ofthe actual threats posed by terrorism continued even after the Khobar Towers attack on June 25, 1996, the bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania on Aug. 7, 1998, and the Oct. 12, 2000, attack on the USS Cole.The former Democratic Presidentcontinued to understate the intelligence threats to Americans even after Osama bin Laden openly declared war on the

United States

.

The Clinton Administration then, and now the rest of the current democrats and their Presidential Candidate Barrack Hussein Obama as well, took on and now take on a "look or sound tough" approach, but in reality a profoundly weak, almost, do-nothing attitude. To that end, it seems the Clinton Administration prosecuted a blind man for driving a truck into that WTC building in '93 and then bombed a deserted desert training camp–emulating the French method of placate, supplicate and surrender and be occupied. Obama, just wants to talk to the avowed enemy of America.

Where was the intelligence in 1993? Where were the badgering democratically controlled congressional intelligence oversight committee and media then? Wasn't the intelligence budget cut to the bone before

President

Bush

took office? Yes! Of course, but today the war in

Iraq

is still Bush's fault entirely. That is todayaccording to the 'progressive' ‘fools in sheep’s clothing’.

Collapsing before the very eyes of Americans on

9/11/01

was the same

World

Trade

Center

in

New York

that was attacked in 1993.

This Democratic failure to defend

America

is the predominant cause of the Iraq War.

Now Senator B. Hussein O. plans toinvoke a similar contortion of logic and go and talk to the world’s dictators and particularly so with

Iran

’s, screwball, leader Ahmidinijad who has oftensworn to destroy

America

.

The entire Democratic attack on the Bush Administration is based on the erroneous accusation that pre-war intelligence was overstated by Bush, in order to go to war in

Iraq

for ulterior motives. So the current Democrats and their nominee B. Hussein O. swami, for President in ’08, are all committed, I predict, if they win the election to repeat the 9/11/01 history or worse.

Whatever else may be alleged by these shallow minded democrats, the

United States

itself has not been attacked since

9/11/01

, that is 7 years. Yes, other countries in

Europe

have been, but not

America

. The President undertook the necessary defense and clearly the proper offense. Therefore, it cannot be overstatement. Empirical evidence of weapons of mass destruction did exist–first in their use on natives in

Iraq

and residue on artillery shells thereafter. More recently the 550 metric tons of ‘yellow cake uranium’ was exported out of

Iraq

recently. Yellow cake is used as the base for making weapons grade plutonium. As to the rest, ask those nations bought off at the UN by

Iraq

at the time.

Democrats now demand withdrawal of the American troops from

Iraq

because they accuse Bush and his administration of overestimating the threat to

America

. Democrats evidently prefer to continue underestimating danger to the safety of overestimating danger.

The same thing took place in pre-war intelligence in the Pacific in 1941.

The Democratic Party motto should be: "If it works, try something else." Ipso facto.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply